> Of course there is at least one such multiple: 103 * 618. 103 * 618 is divisible by 2, which is a prime strictly smaller than 103. Every multiple of 618 is d

> Of course there is at least one such multiple: 103 * 618. 103 * 618 is divisible by 2, which is a prime strictly smaller than 103. Every multiple of 618 is divisible by 618, and so is also divisible by anything that divides 618. A cousin comment clarifies that, for x * 618, we're interested in the divisors of x, not x * 618. The article, however, is at best ambiguous in its language; you'd have to interpret the term "multiple" as meaning the multiplier applied to the base number, not the result of said multiplication. The latter is what is usually understood.