4 ms·
It's cheaper than their nearest competitor in the space: http://www.box.net/pricing/ http://www.box.net/pricing/
by TomOfTTB 15y ago
It's cheaper than their nearest competitor in the space: http://www.box.net/pricing/ http://www.box.net/pricing/
- wildster 15y agoJungledisk is much much cheaper. https://www.jungledisk.com/business/ https://www.jungledisk.com/business/
- isnotchicago 15y ago200GB x 5 users (what Dropbox gives you) would cost $1950 per year on Jungledisk ($4 + 190gb*$0.15 per user). In practice, Jungledisk could be much cheaper since you only pay for what you use on Jungledisk. But you would have to do the math for your teams expected usage.
- rufibarbatus 15y agoGoogle Docs offers ca. 1 GB for free, and sells storage upgrades of 20 GB at 5 USD/year. That means prices match at about 3 TB. So on the one hand, you have DropBox with unlimited storage and a limited, upgradeable number of users. On the other hand, you have Google, with limited, upgradable storage, and unlimited users. If only Google's storage was a bit more usable. (Also, I have a hunch an AWS-based solution may be cheaper depending on some other variables.) Like I said, the problem is not so much the package and price as it's the fact that it's the only package they're offering right now. I see very few use cases in practice for unlimited storage and limited users. EDIT: s/unlimited storage/200 GB per user/ where applicable