3 ms·
How is this BS? "How AI technology can tame the scientific literature" https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06617-5 https://www.nature.com/articles/d4158
by andreyk 4y ago
How is this BS?
"How AI technology can tame the scientific literature" https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06617-5 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06617-5
"SCIBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text" https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.10676.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.10676.pdf
"Domain-specific language model pretraining for biomedical natural language processing" https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3458754 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3458754
These are just examples I pulled up in a couple minutes of Googling. Yeah, the wording here may be a little too grandiose, but nevertheless the fact that AI can read through vast sets of papers and data quickly and help humans sort through it is fundamentally true.
- YeGoblynQueenne 4y agoCan I ask? Did you read those three papers carefully before linking them? I'm asking because a scientific paper's purpose is to make one or more claims (but usually one central claim), that are supported in the paper by theoretical and empirical results. It is hard to know whether any particular claim is true, even when reading the paper carefully and scrutinising, or even attempting to replicate, its results - let alone otherwise.