3 ms·
Using Clubhouse as the end-all for social audio does the "space" a disservice, IMO. I used Clubhouse early on and it fell squarely into every single trope and c
by goopthink 4y ago
Using Clubhouse as the end-all for social audio does the "space" a disservice, IMO. I used Clubhouse early on and it fell squarely into every single trope and commentary that everyone here is posting about it.
Much later, I was introduced to "Cappuccino" [1], a social audio app that couldn't be more different from Clubhouse. It's slow-social (you only get updates once day (the cappuccino composed of 'beans' that everyone submits). Each audio update is capped at 3 minutes (though you can submit as many as you'd like), and you can attach a photo if you'd like. The app auto-adds some generic intro/outtro music and production cleanup and combines it into a single podcast-like update.
I've found myself using this pretty actively with small groups of friends. The audio-first approach makes it easy to just talk about something (an idea, a life update) for a few moments (low cost to participate). The production value and once-a-day update makes it feel like a nice 'ritual' to receive everyone's updates. The intentionally asyncronousness emphasizes listening and thoughtfulness against trying to hop on to a comment thread. It honestly feels like sending postcards/letters out to folks... but audio. Can you do this as an audio group text? Kind of, yes. But that's like saying "you can recreate instagram by sending photos over whatsapp." Yes, but that misses the point.
I'm not affiliated in any way with them but I think they're a very neat counterpoint to Clubhouse in terms of "social audio" (and slow vs fast social).
[1] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/cappuccino-stay-in-touch/id1506849927 https://apps.apple.com/us/app/cappuccino-stay-in-touch/id150...
- soneca 4y ago> ” I've found myself using this pretty actively with small groups of friends” Would people listen to these small updates? Audio is pretty big in WhatsApp. But it’s widely accepted that audio messages are good for people who send it and bad for who receive (it is a hassle to listen to it, even at 2x, comparing to reading a text message). Also, your use case seems very well covered by WhatsApp and Telegram. I am part of a Telegram from a famous writer where he only sends audio messages (one-to-many, closed threads, only accepts emojis). It is hard to differentiate a product enough as an audio only social network to beat Telegram and WhatsApp on most use cases.
- Flimm 4y agoCappuccino only delivers audio messages the next morning, all mixed together in one audio track. You listen to it at your leisure, like drinking a morning coffee, or at least that's the idea. I find WhatsApp voice messages annoying, as I can't tell if they're urgent or not without listening to the full audio message after scrambling to find my headphones. In contrast, I know Cappuccino voice messages aren't urgent, since they're only delivered to me the next morning. I tried it with a group of friends, but it didn't take off, sadly, for a couple of reasons. But I did not feel annoyed by them the way I do for WhatsApp voice messages. I hope Cappuccino takes off, I think it's a good idea that with good execution that deserves to succeed.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]