3 ms·

You would also not trust the result of a single human on the asteroid but it would be double checked by someone else. That's the point. What do humans get inst

You would also not trust the result of a single human on the asteroid but it would be double checked by someone else. That's the point. What do humans get instead of training data? What do you mean by "something else", and why can't some artificial neural network (ANN) not have the same? Maybe you mean it does not get supervised labeled data? But unsupervised data is also just training data, and in fact ANNs are very successful in also using such unsupervised training data. So I really do not see the distinction between AI and human intelligence. And the argument why an AI can't make a discovery and a human can.

coding123 4y ago
If I were to call information we use (as humans) to become an adult "training data" it would be seeing the world, eating baby food, getting spanked, falling in love, etc... is, in my opinion, something else. It's not training data. It's a completely different kind of conditioning. I think for us to call "training data" and the complete social evolution of a single human mind the same thing is ridiculous - AT THIS TIME. I'm not saying NNs (or some future AI tech) is NOT capable of reaching this status - but that's General AI. I haven't been reached out by OpenAI 5 in Gmail saying hey do you want to play a game of Dota 2 with me? It hasn't called me on the phone wanting to hang out. It's completely different. When those things happen we can talk but the original poster and myself are predicating this on "CURRENT AI" not theoretical AI.