3 ms·

I can't get past the question about the conditions under which the disclosures became deemed necessary. Everything else definitely never ought to be clear or yo

• the_af 4y ago
  I honestly don't understand your reply, could you reword it please? Thanks.
  • xpe 4y ago
    >> I can't get past the question about the conditions under which the disclosures became deemed necessary. Everything else definitely never ought to be clear or you have a problem with arbitrary decision making agency out of hand. > I honestly don't understand your reply, could you reword it please? Thanks. I also find it confusing. Here's my understanding: the commenter is asking something akin to this question: Why did Snowden's deem his disclosures to be necessary? Based on my understanding of Snowden, he deemed his disclosures necessary because he views these NSA programs as unjust and/or undemocratic and would continue (and probably get worse) if not revealed. >> Everything else definitely never ought to be clear or you have a problem with arbitrary decision making agency out of hand. I'm unclear on what this sentence as a whole means. First, I wonder if "never ought" was a typo and the commenter meant just "ought". Second, I'd guess that "arbitrary decision making agency out of hand" probably was meant to be "arbitrary agency decision making out of hand", suggesting that the NSA was overstepping its bounds.