> (Or, a wrecking ball. Which I'd be more than happy with at this point.) I doubt that would be necessary or appropriate. A lot of thought, discussion, and wor

> (Or, a wrecking ball. Which I'd be more than happy with at this point.) I doubt that would be necessary or appropriate. A lot of thought, discussion, and work has already gone into the design, and I'm inclined to assume that the people involved knew what they were doing. Rust's zero-overhead approach to async is much more ambitious than the async support in other languages. More work on the interactions with other language features would certainly be useful, but I think suggesting that the existing implementation be discarded is more likely to frustrate the people who have been doing all of this hard work than to accomplish anything useful.