And if they do, they can appoint that someone else on their own -- it's how the world's free countries operate, after all; and a country is bigger than a compan

And if they do, they can appoint that someone else on their own -- it's how the world's free countries operate, after all; and a country is bigger than a company. That's still a "manager" someone to manager better coordination. The point here is that such a role is required to get work done. Sure, there are weird things that happen when the manager stops being a bottom-up appointee and starts being a top-down ruler. Heck that is incredibly common. But that does not mean we should do away with central figures that handle coordination. You still need those central figures.