4 ms·
That's equivocation between a pyramid as hierarchy and a pyramid as a specific business model. As far as I know, capitalism doesn't require constant recruitment
by guerrilla 4y ago
That's equivocation between a pyramid as hierarchy and a pyramid as a specific business model. As far as I know, capitalism doesn't require constant recruitment because growth can be achieved in other ways like reducing product quality, reducing wages, deteriorating working conditions, increasing technological efficiency, enclosing commons, privatizing public goods and services, etc.
- sky-kedge0749 4y agoCapitalism usually means a small owning class and a large working class, which is the hierarchy. It doesn't actually require a pyramid scheme system of recruitment, you could just have an enforcer class that beats the workers into hopeless submission and consumption. The way it works now though is that workers at every level are led to believe they can rise up the pyramid. This is a good complement to the raw violence which is still there: this belief reduces enforcement costs, encourages consumption, and allows for some necessary meritocratic elevation to the educated technical/bureaucratic class.
- guerrilla 4y agoYeah I didn't ask if capitalism is a hierarchy, that's obvious. The claim is that it's a pyramid scheme which is an unrelated claim.
- rlili 4y agoThe alternatives that you listed seem likely to eventually lead consumers to stop consuming a product. Population growth, on the other hand, does not. Unless, of course, we reach the inevitable point where resources become so scarce that no one can consume anymore. But that future is still distant enough to be systematically ignored. Hell, even climate change is still being barely addressed.
- guerrilla 4y agoPopulation has an upper limit too anyway... growth can inly go so far, which is beside the point.