8 ms·
Google+ is now available with Google Apps
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- Kylekramer 15y agoNow that is has been turned on, I got to agree with saurik (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3132566 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3132566). It doesn't really make sense. Why would I want my social network profile attached to and controlled by my school or work? I remember a family member going through a difficult transition when he was laid off from a job he was working at for decades and no longer had access to just his email/contacts. If people use Google+ like Google wants them to, there is going to be even more important stuff held in accounts that the user doesn't really control. Hangouts for Docs can be useful, I suppose, and I am glad those with custom domains are invited to the party, but it seems like an awkward fit.
- JonWood 15y agoI think is largely aimed at the people who are using Google Apps for their own domain. I certainly wouldn't want a corporate account tied to my Google+ identity, but my own domain and email address which I've been using for over a decade definitely fit the bill.
- tednaleid 15y agoYep, that's the boat I'm in. I've got google apps for my own domain, and maintain 2 personal accounts on there (one for friends, one for acquaintances), my work is also on google apps. That means that there are already 3 google accounts that I'm juggling (or struggling with) and I was loathe to add a 4th account just to use google plus.
- deadcyclo 15y agoBut it has further use as well. You can have your own personal identity on your gmail address and your official corporate identity on apps. Mixing roles is never a good idea and g+ on apps makes it easier to avoid.
- tomkarlo 15y agoIf you don't want your social profile controlled by your school or work, don't use your school or work email address as your login. I'm not sure that's even specific to Google+... There's a reverse of that use case: a school or org may want to provide social networking to its users, specifically for that context, e.g. exchange of information within the institution.
- nickknw 15y ago> There's a reverse of that use case: a school or org may want to provide social networking to its users, specifically for that context, e.g. exchange of information within the institution. Wow, that's actually really interesting. I hadn't thought of that angle before but I could see that happening.
- dustingetz 15y ago> exchange of information within the institution yes. an organization's "knowledge" is mostly persisted in email. G+ is a huge step forward in knowledge sharing, discovery, and recovery within an organization.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- InclinedPlane 15y agoKeep in mind that you are assuming that something that costs on the order of 50 cents a month necessarily implies that only big corporations rather than individuals use it. There are lots of people who are freelancers or founders who use email at their own domain as their personal email.
- justincormack 15y agoIt is free for individuals, or was maybe they changed that? I ised it for free for seversl years but just started paying in the hope of getting better support. Given I didnt I am probably going to go back to free.
- InclinedPlane 15y agoI meant the total cost, I was including domain registration. Apps for your domain is free for businesses and individuals under a certain threshold.
- idoh 15y agoStill free but the link is kind of buried.
- rhubarbquid 15y agoThey also recently dropped the free version to 10 accounts instead of 50.
- mapgrep 15y ago"Why would I want my social network profile attached to and controlled by my school or work?" The better question is why would you want your email address controlled by one company? Those of who decided we want something portable that doesn't end in "@gmail.com" now have access to Google Plus.
- rogerbraun 15y agoNo way to join accounts, again. I can not understand why this kind of basic functionality is missing. EDIT: Just to clarify, I mean there is now way to connect a Google Apps account to another Google account so that they can share certain services. I sort of understand why they think they don't need it for email, but having two separate G+ account is completely superfluous, thanks to the Circles system.
- thurn 15y agoIt's not like you can join two Facebook accounts you made with different emails either. That alone makes it clear that this is isn't "basic functionality".
- psychotik 15y agoCreating two Facebook accounts is an anomaly, not the norm. To use a personal G account & Google Apps, you MUST create two different accounts. Your example here comparing this to Facebook isn't valid, IMO.
- ceejayoz 15y agoYou can create a Facebook account with two e-mails attached to it, though.
- rogerbraun 15y agoI don't think that this is the same. I can not think of a reason why one should have two Facebook accounts, except for maintaining two complete separate sets of relations, for example for anonymity. But having several Google accounts can happen much easier, for a variety of reasons. For example, I have used a GMail address for since my teen years. Turns out I don't actually like the format stupidnickname@gmail.com anymore and would rather have something like myname@mydomain.com, but I'd still like to keep the GMail interface. Google Apps is wonderful for this, so I made an account there. But I can not just ignore my old account, as I still get email sent to the address (I forward it) and I used the Google Talk functionality for my Jabber needs. Also, I bought my first Android apps with my old account, so they are linked to it. That means that I have to use my old account as the first one on any Android device, or I can't download my apps again. What I would wish for is this: Have services that can be linked to any identifier/email, and shared between any number of them, so I could, for example, have two sets of email (one private, one business), but just one of GTalk, G+, Feedburner and Analytics. I know that implementing this on top of the current system might be hard. I still think that this is the kind of functionality one can expect from a company like Google, and I would gladly pay for it.
- mtkd 15y agoCongrats on Google getting it out this week. There was quite a bit of cynicism after the announcement last week. I've been holding off joining until my personal Apps domain was enabled as I've still not finished migrating all my docs from Gmail yet - I didn't want any more loose ends.
- furyg3 15y agoJust wanted to echo the thoughts of mtkd. I have my own personal domain mostly because I want to maintain control of my own email address. I connected it to Google Apps (and am willing to pay for this feature), because Gmail is great. But when Google rolls out a new service which doesn't have Apps support (which they do all the time), it's pretty frustrating. The irony is that if I didn't use Apps, and instead hosted my domain myself, I'd have better compatibility with Google products than when I do. Frustrating as hell, especially if you're paying for it. I understand that they're stuck between vanity users (like me) and enterprise users, but these problems should be thought about more structurally and addressed beforehand.
- marcocampos 15y agoWell, activated Picasa Web Albums, Google Chat and Google+ and it doesn't work. Maybe in a few days?
- jigs_up 15y agoCan't sign in with Android app.
- badclient 15y agoVote up if you think google+ will be deadpooled in the next year.
- jigs_up 15y agoNow if only they could get their multiple account sign-in feature polished. I use one Google account for Youtube, one for Google groups, and then my Apps account for email and plus. Why can't I set my preferred account for each service? The day I went to Google.com and noticed I was signed in was the first sign of trouble. Why do I have to have my account used everywhere I go? I don't want you to log me in for searching when I check my email.
- skystorm 15y agoI would argue that you are probably the exception from the norm -- most users have only one account and would probably consider it a major inconvenience to have to log in multiple times across different Google properties.
- richardw 15y agoExcept they do have a multiple-accounts feature, so obviously it's important enough to support explicitly. I also hate the way it works. I have to use different browsers to have it work without irritation. Hmm. Maybe there's a plugin.
- ryandvm 15y agoCurious to see how much this bumps the active Google+ account numbers. Google claims about 40 million Apps users right now.
- rhubarbquid 15y agoI'd guess not much. Most people who wanted to use G+ already signed up with a Gmail account. Unless you're counting one person maintaining personal and professional profiles as 2 active accounts...
- detst 15y agoFrom the headline, I thought this might be an option to create a private network for your domain, like Google's internal version of Google+. This is nice, but that would be much more interesting.
- bad_user 15y agoI'm really happy for this news, thanks Google. I was begging to feel a little left out.
- diamondhead 15y ago"Your Browser is no longer supported. http://www.google.com/support/plus/bin/answer.py?hl=en&p=browser_support&answer=1347815 http://www.google.com/support/plus/bin/answer.py?hl=en&p... " Now, I get this idiotic error since I don't use one of the major web browsers (FF, IE, Chrome, Safari). I really hate the websites (such as read.amazon.com) that ignores the other webkit based web browsers (uzbl, luakit, surf...) with same capabilities with Chrome and Firefox. (I don't even compare them with IE!)
- riobard 15y agoThat's why we should use feature-detection instead of browser/version-detection for web development.
- diamondhead 15y agoNo way to login with the profile that I had created before Google banned Apps users. I'm still looking at my own profile as an anonymous visitor and only thing I can do is to create a new profile!
- meeeu 15y agoI'm a big fan of all Google products in general. People who understand the product anticipates it and are excited about it, like Google Wave for example. But sometimes it's less about the product than the way it is presented. Waves for example was presented as the end-all, stand alone collaborative tool. But when nobody understood it enough to use it the general public doesn't care about it. In the case of Google+ it is presented as a Facebook competitor in the social networking market. Everyone and their moms are already on Facebook so why would people want to update another profile and do more work. However, the advantage of Google+ is that it is backed by the Google infrastructure, which includes the established Gmail user base. Gmail already feels like a social networking product; you can easily chat with friends and new acquaintances, share events with other with Google Calendars, and use tons of Google Apps. The point is Google already is a social network. We don't need to be confused with a new product called Google+. It's social networking features should have just been revealed as a subset of Gmail. Many are already familiar with Gmail and new social networking features will draw more people to it.
- methodin 15y agoGoogle+ was never presented as a Facebook competitor. They tried social networking with Gmail with Buzz and that failed miserably. I don't really know what the problem is. The uber bar is more than sufficient.
- meeeu 15y agoI never used Buzz. It just confused me when I saw the Buzz icon like when the 'mark as important icon' was new in Gmail. Maybe it would have worked if people can use the chat box to share content and do their status update. And then the feed can all paginate in one or more email maybe right above the first email in the inbox. People are all used to chat and checking their mail, maybe even naturally 'Buzz'. Don't really know too much about uber bar.
- mrspandex 15y agoI wish Google would just allow my normal Google account to be associated with a domain for Gmail...