> Another perspective is that if the DNC hadn't engaged in corrupt practices then foreign intelligence services wouldn't have anything to leak. There was no le

> Another perspective is that if the DNC hadn't engaged in corrupt practices then foreign intelligence services wouldn't have anything to leak. There was no leakage of GOP emails, therefore there was nothing to leak, i.e., no corruption of concern. If I misread your intent I apologize, it can be challenging in the most benign situations and it's more so tricky when its a subject of disagreement. But my claim still unfortunately holds. The DNC leak was a political hit job that only intended to smear the opposing party. A better example is Hunter Biden -- his employment really was with corrupt intents and if there really was evidence that corruption was rewarded it should be prosecuted. But if that very concern is legitimate, then it should be applied to all. There's plenty of evidence of that a certain son-in-law engaged in far more egregious affairs and there is not a peep about that. So I couldn't help but read your comment as yet another "gotcha" that fuels this false narrative.