3 ms·
And not to mention, like you do towards the end, one of his biggest "changes" for Twitter that he proposed was "solving the bot problem". "Hey, I can solve FSD
by FireBeyond 4y ago
And not to mention, like you do towards the end, one of his biggest "changes" for Twitter that he proposed was "solving the bot problem".
"Hey, I can solve FSD. And I could have solved the Twitter bot problem, but apparently the latter is just too big a hurdle if there's more than 5% of bots."
It makes zero sense.
- marcusverus 4y agoHow does it not make sense? He wants to get rid of bots AND he wants to pay a fair price for Twitter. It seems like people are working really hard not to understand this situation.
- FireBeyond 4y agoHe said "There are too many bots on Twitter. I want to buy it because I can fix that issue (and other reasons)." Now: "Woah, there's too many bots on Twitter. I don't want it."
- 93po 4y agoHe's saying he doesn't want to pay the agreed price if Twitter lied about the number of real users. I find it hard to believe you're not understanding this
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- FireBeyond 4y agoSo he's saying that Twitter has regularly been lying to the SEC and their own investors about it? Because all these numbers come from their SEC filings, and specify caveats, etc. So that's a pretty serious allegation.
- 93po 4y agoHe's saying he doesn't know, because Twitter won't provide the information needed to make the determination.
- cafard 4y agoHe wants to pay his price for Twitter, but not the price he agreed to.
- camjohnson26 4y agoThe whole thing is bad faith. Twitter’s SEC filings clearly state that the number of bots could be higher: https://twitter.com/jowens510/status/1533853572374220801?s=20&t=Lv9wJU93tAFvu0mntsFGNA https://twitter.com/jowens510/status/1533853572374220801?s=2...