>[first paragraph] This post is probably not on top of HN because “the media” uses him for ad revenue, just saying. >[second] That’s not even close to the fu

>[first paragraph] This post is probably not on top of HN because “the media” uses him for ad revenue, just saying. >[second] That’s not even close to the full picture. Its not like he went into a shop with cash to buy a car. Not saying that the gp is 100% correct either, but gross simplifications don’t help the discourse. Edit - To clarify: if he believed in the purchase as an investment, temporary tech valuations would not matter, what would matter is the quality of the product relative to the changes he wanted to make in the company. Twitter is very much intact, it didn’t materially change since the situation began.