3 ms·
> Yes, and if you hadn't moved to London then you would indeed have a car I've since moved out of London, and still have no car. > transportation "must have
by nonrandomstring 4y ago
> Yes, and if you hadn't moved to London then you would indeed have a
car
I've since moved out of London, and still have no car.
> transportation "must haves"
There are no "must haves" in this world.
> car dependency is a serious problem, cities being built, such as in
China which are wholly car depending, and designed to punish non-car
moving people, it is a bad, bad, bad state of affairs
Yes, that's tragic. And I don't think those places have a long-term
future as they are. Fortunately urban areas can undergo radical
redesign. I think the post-pandemic is going to force that on us
anyway.
- bluGill 4y agoThere are many places where you can live without a car. However they are overall a minority. Most people in the US live where living without the car is next to impossible. either there isn't any transit at all, or there is transit that only works for someone working 9-5 downtown, but you are still expected to drive a car for all other errands. Yes in the core of a few other cities (New York is most obvious) you can reasonably live without a car. Most people don't live close enough to the core though. The bad transit options is the first thing that needs to change. However nobody actually cares about that. Democrats are more interested in union jobs even though it drives costs up to the point where it isn't cost effective. Republicans don't even realize that it would be possible to have useful transit and so they fight throwing good money after bad.