Doesn't appear to have an IDL nor does it appear to generate proxies on the client side. At least from a cursory reading. But I do agree that it appears to be

Doesn't appear to have an IDL nor does it appear to generate proxies on the client side. At least from a cursory reading. But I do agree that it appears to be another in a long line of remote object protocols. It's not obvious why this will succeed where the others haven't as it appears to have the same flaws but with some extra ones of its own e.g the client doesn't seem to type the remote method calls. Would have been nice to have some argumentation as to why it won't crash and burn like its predecessors but I'm guessing that either the authors aren't aware of them or they don't believe their clients will be.