3 ms·
I disagree with your assumption that this approach is better than xournal++ approach.<br> Do you really believe this is "better way" than xournal++? If if had b
by gauddasa 4y ago
I disagree with your assumption that this approach is better than xournal++ approach.<br>
Do you really believe this is "better way" than xournal++? If if had been a better way than xournal++, I would not have commented about xournal++ in first place.
- jstimpfle 4y agoThat is't my assumption. My assumption is they don't have to be "better than". If they feel they got something out of it, that is enough justification. What is wrong with you?
- gauddasa 4y agoOh, got your point. It's an experimentation then. I thought it's an advertisement, so I too started advertising xournal++.
- beowulfey 4y agoWelcome to Hacker News. The community is generally very open to new ideas, and loves to see personal projects, but they are not exactly "advertisements" and there is no reason to think of a project that is somewhat similar to your own as being "in competition". That kind of confrontational attitude is disfavored here. Xournal++ looks like a very nice piece of software. Thank you for sharing; I had never seen it before. It is worth submitting it separately so others can see it too (perhaps not today, unless you want people to make the connection with your comments here -- I don't think it would go over well).