3 ms·
Automatic scoring doesn't help with selecting the interesting content. The answer to manipulated scores shouldn't be no scoring, but better scoring. Where is t
by closedloop129 4y ago
Automatic scoring doesn't help with selecting the interesting content. The answer to manipulated scores shouldn't be no scoring, but better scoring.
Where is the interest in a public scoring/voting infrastructure that highlights good content? At least RSS readers, search engines and bookmarking services should need it, but I am not aware of any initiative.
- kkfx 4y agoAnd isn't the better scoring those made locally by yourself? I suggest for ML https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06974 https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06974 or the fact you can't even trust a public model, since you can't really control it regularly in training terms. You are right saying there is not much scoring in RSS, beside Gnus I know zero other feed readers who do anything alike. In search engines terms, beside YaCy witch is distributed and not so good, I do not know anything else, about bookmarking there are countless "managers" but I doubt they can be useful: in scoring terms, for discovering, we need the classic Usenet and sharing. It can be done, so far no one AFAIK have done that, but in practical terms nothing is still better than modern corporate systems anyway...