3 ms·
I feel like security bugs are in a class of their own and need different ways of thinking about them. If you leave aside security bugs, is Linus’ law still inv
by statictype 4y ago
I feel like security bugs are in a class of their own and need different ways of thinking about them.
If you leave aside security bugs, is Linus’ law still invalid?
Any reference to any material on this?
- tptacek 4y agoIt's still not true if you leave security bugs out. It's basically never true except for a thin class of superficial bugs --- the bugs you'd intuitively expect to get diagnosed get diagnosed, but nothing else does.
- pvg 4y agohttps://ai.googleblog.com/2006/06/extra-extra-read-all-about-it-nearly.html https://ai.googleblog.com/2006/06/extra-extra-read-all-about... But more importantly, it says 'all bugs' not 'all bugs except for these other bugs which would make the whole thing untrue'