4 ms·

I think inflicting sexual, physical, verbal, and psychological abuse—to say nothing of paying one’s workers a pittance, or not paying them at all—goes a little

• colechristensen 4y ago
  Of course there is a point at which everything goes too far, but for a certain kind of person an amount of many of those things seems not to be abuse.
• throwaway_49u 4y ago
  That's when you become a cop.
• throwaway0a5e 4y ago
  That's pretty much just a statement about your frame of reference. These people could go and get jobs in a shipyard or a tire factory and their conduct wouldn't really raise any eyebrows.
• jazzyjackson 4y ago
  I don't the the parent was describing the abusers as misfits, but that the job can accomodate people who don't fit in to other work to put it another way, it's not that the kitchen turns people into alcoholics, it's that alcoholics find it hard to work anywhere else (since they can indulge their vice while gainfully employed) As for abusers, they may find it convenient to fill their payroll with people who can't make it elsewhere (drug addicts, misfits), such that your employees won't quit the second you start sexually harassing them (edit: a sibling comment to you makes a good point about the cycle of abuse, start as a misfit, get hazed, perpetuate the cycle of hiring people who put up with your abuse because they have no where else to go)
• pempem 4y ago
  Usually the guild of hazing/abusive behavior exists outside of the group that is actually making the most margin in these businesses: - landlords - owners of the brand