1. Bio article 2. Peer review not done for local web publish 3. Not going to over-emphisize but the research "centres of excellence" aren't Oxford or Harvard

1. Bio article 2. Peer review not done for local web publish 3. Not going to over-emphisize but the research "centres of excellence" aren't Oxford or Harvard here 4. The reproducibility crisis in bio 5. It's clearly trying to get more attention than it's worth. Unless I recalibrate my expectations of reality (yes I work in research as a published professional) it's bad. (Eg this is defending publications of "Highs signal at 110GeV" from the tevatron as being worth reading in the 00's. It's clearly biased as we now know it couldn't have happened) 6. I'm not sure how we get from my comment of 1 study to there being no obesity epidemic in burgerland. Please stop reading vitriol into my comments.