I take from the downvotes that people thought this was serious. Its absurdity was intended to show how misleading the use of the word "destruction" is when talk

I take from the downvotes that people thought this was serious. Its absurdity was intended to show how misleading the use of the word "destruction" is when talking about economic costs derived from things that are no longer needed. Being more healthy, or more efficient, is unequivocally good!