I think it will be the opposite. We really don't have much proof that vaccines reduced transmission. It could be to some extent but how meaningful was that? W

I think it will be the opposite. We really don't have much proof that vaccines reduced transmission. It could be to some extent but how meaningful was that? We also know that some governments but not all governments implemented vaccine mandates. For example, the UK was pretty lax on them but Germany was very strict. Occam's razor indicates that apparently some governments didn't have scientific basis for mandates. The opposite that they really had all scientific proof but somehow hid that from the public sounds like a conspiration theory and does not cut the mustard.