3 ms·
It doesn’t need to be like this, but that’s what her family chose. One model isn’t superior over the other. It would be great if tech companies supported both f
by in_cahoots 4y ago
It doesn’t need to be like this, but that’s what her family chose. One model isn’t superior over the other. It would be great if tech companies supported both family styles, just like they tout their other family-friendly benefits.
- jjeaff 4y agoI agree that people can do what they want. But I can't help but wish people did not do this. I don't think anyone honestly believes that children are not better off by having more balanced input from both parents where possible. And the more people that do this (where the working parent is a workaholic) the more difficult it makes things for working parents who want to have a more balanced home life. This is similar to the modern issue of dual income families. In the area where I live, homes are very expensive. The majority of home owners here could simply not afford a home without both parents working. Which means if there weren't so many dual income families, homes would simply have to become cheaper here. The fact that many families here are dual income puts financial pressure on everyone else to do the same.
- oldsecondhand 4y agoIf you want to live among the rich, you have to pay the entry fee.
- kmonsen 4y agoSure they can choose that but it comes with tradeoffs. It seems in hindsight those tradeoffs were a little bit less appealing.