3 ms·
There’s nothing arrogant in my comment. Like I said, Gitea is good. Like all other software, iterations improve quality, and I’m just saying it’s time for the n
by ironmagma 4y ago
There’s nothing arrogant in my comment. Like I said, Gitea is good. Like all other software, iterations improve quality, and I’m just saying it’s time for the next iteration. I probably would have written Gitea the exact same way if I were in the developers’ shoes, but that doesn’t mean a rewrite wouldn’t still be in order.
As for the so what, I think the answer is just that things can be better, so if someone is out there reading this thread who has some time, they can see this and know what kind of improvements can be made.
- muhehe 4y agoSuggesting improvements is ok. Recommending complete rewrite in different stack and technologies is not constructive critique imo.
- ironmagma 4y agoElsewhere on the Internet, someone posted: > If it ain't broke don't fix it? Or is there some specific shortcomming that might justify a rewrite? I’m answering that question. The information is out there, so if people want to ignore it that’s beyond my mandate. But this is still constructive since someone out there wanting to rewrite Gitea will want to know what the pain points are before they do so.