3 ms·
I don't see any connection between the content and the claim that "'relevant ads are good' is bullshit". It's just a general argument that ads are bad, because
by SilasX 4y ago
I don't see any connection between the content and the claim that "'relevant ads are good' is bullshit". It's just a general argument that ads are bad, because they're biased.
If you want to dispute "relevant ads are good", you'd need to establish why I get no benefit from seeing ads that are relevant to me vs not.
- pdimitar 4y agoI disagree with you reversing the argument. I want advertisers to prove beyond ANY doubt that ads do bring benefits to most of the populace. If they can't do that then the onus is definitely not on me to "prove ads give me no benefit". That's like putting a toxic gas in my room and asking me can I prove it's bad for me. Even if I can't prove it I can definitely say I was fine without it before.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]