4 ms·
Maybe? Certainly more offspring was normal, the further back you go. So wealth division could more easily happen. But most cultures had the idea of the "firs
by b112 4y ago
Maybe?
Certainly more offspring was normal, the further back you go. So wealth division could more easily happen.
But most cultures had the idea of the "first born", the official heir... for this very reason! Most of the loot, holdings, tended to go the eldest.
- algorias 4y agoThis is no longer legal in many jurisdictions. Family members often have a minimum allocation of the inheritance (e.g. 25% must be equally split among all children)
- ntoskrnl 4y agoWhat jurisdiction is this?
- plonk 4y agoFrance has a floor on the percentage each descendant gets.
- b112 4y agoInteresting, and most places it is culturally unacceptable regardless. Yet the proverb is historical, as all proverbs are, and my response was intended to refute the dissolution of wealth, historically, by spreading it too thin. Our ancestors didn't do that.