4 ms·
I understand, but I'm saying it's fraud. I think we somehow have lowered our standards for 'business'. If customers prefer the second mix, then there's no reaso
by wolverine876 4y ago
I understand, but I'm saying it's fraud. I think we somehow have lowered our standards for 'business'. If customers prefer the second mix, then there's no reason the vendor can't label it as such and let customers make up their own minds.
- wirthjason 4y agoI see what you mean. I totally agree. It’s a bit like a bait an switch. I’m not aware of any consumer protection laws against something like that. The only thing I could think of is either regulated products, like buying 2% milk that isn’t 2%. Or where it’s a obviously counterfeit. In the former case of regulation Bryers ice cream changed their labeling to remove “ice cream” because it doesn’t meet the USDA definition of ice cream and instead call it “frozen dairy dessert”. https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/news/is-your-favorite-ice-cream-posing-as-something-else/ https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/news/is-your-favorite-ice... The best people could do is vote with their dollars but it’s not always obvious.