The opinion is very clearly written and lays out why bees can be protected under the law in question. This is a passage from the supporting evidence section:

The opinion is very clearly written and lays out why bees can be protected under the law in question. This is a passage from the supporting evidence section: """In 1969, the Legislature amended section 45 via Senate Bill No. 858 (1969 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 858) to add invertebrates and amphibia to the definition of fish. (Stats. 1969, ch. 689, § 1.) Section 45 has been amended only once since 1969 -- in 2015 (effective January 1, 2016), when the Legislature made nonsubstantive stylistic changes, modifying the definition to read “ ‘[f]ish’ means a wild fish, mollusk, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian, or part, spawn, or ovum of any of those animals.” """ [1] https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C093542.PDF https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C093542.PDF