>the current generation of renewable energy is so much more expensive and involved than the equivalent in a nuclear energy plant. This may have been true 15 or

>the current generation of renewable energy is so much more expensive and involved than the equivalent in a nuclear energy plant. This may have been true 15 or even 10 years ago, but nowadays the exact opposite is the case. > It's very attractive to get solar panels installed on your house, but the grid cannot handle the influx of new production. Whereas attaching a new nuclear plant to the main grid would be less of a headache. How is that supposed to make any sense at all? The grid likes nuclear-flavored power better?