4 ms·
The comments objecting to this are bizarre. In the predatory capitalist US, the number of private companies- not subject to any real regulation, or supervision
by jonahbenton 4y ago
The comments objecting to this are bizarre.
In the predatory capitalist US, the number of private companies- not subject to any real regulation, or supervision, or action on the part of citizens- that have exactly this data and more numbers literally in the thousands.
And while a lot of attention is paid to government data collection, it is very hard for various parts of the government in the US to get this information for administrative purposes- as distinct from criminal investigations- and even if government could, it would serve no purpose because except for policing, education, highway maintenance, delivery of mail and healthcare for military veterans, US government entities perform virtually no services.
In Norway, which has extremely high quality of life and a very competent government that runs things like a sovereign wealth fund to the express and explicit benefit of citizens, where the goals of data collection are further improvement of quality of life, the intent and capacity of delivery for which by the government is proven over and over again-
IOW, to be concerned about data collection by an entity that over and over again has demonstrated its competence, especially in the context of alternatives like the US-
WTF are people thinking.
- dane-pgp 4y agoKnowledge is power, and power corrupts, so what you're saying is "I don't mind giving the Norwegian government absolute power, because they aren't absolutely corrupt (yet)".
- Iv 4y agoI would say that the government having the same amount of knowledge that private companies have is not necessarily a bad thing.
- dane-pgp 4y agoThat might be true in the case where that amount of knowledge is precisely zero.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jonahbenton 4y agoI just can't with the aphorisms. Ashes to ashes and dust to dust. So there. Make an actual argument.
- dane-pgp 4y agoI'm sorry you don't like my simple-to-follow chain of aphorisms. My actual argument is expressed in more detail elsewhere on this page, specifically here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31622654 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31622654
- jonahbenton 4y agoI responded. It's not an argument. Specific goods- and there are all sorts of specific goods that can come out of this collection- have to met with specific bads- and there are all sorts of these as well- and considered in the context of actual history and trajectory, not fanciful imaginings.