3 ms·
I think that's a distinction that can make sense and I agree that the definition of the word has been a bit diluted. You obviously don't get disappeared in the
by mardifoufs 4y ago
I think that's a distinction that can make sense and I agree that the definition of the word has been a bit diluted. You obviously don't get disappeared in the NL.
But I don't get your last point. If it was illegal to protest/criticize the Supreme court, and someone did, wouldn't that be straight law infringement too? I don't think they are mutually exclusive.
Insulting an institution, especially that of the Crown, is a form of protest and can be a way to express an unorthodox idea or a rejection of the system.
It's akin to going to jail for insulting Trump, Biden or Bush because you insulted the American presidency. To me that's just unsettling.