> But in reality, all of the information found in the unabomber's manifesto can be found from sources that weren't serial murderers... so what does recommending

> But in reality, all of the information found in the unabomber's manifesto can be found from sources that weren't serial murderers... so what does recommending this writing, and not other related writing accomplish? You're trying to shift the burden of justification to me, when you are the one trying to censor. What does censoring me accomplish in the real world? Does me talking about him make his murders worse then they are? Are Kaczynski's murders going to disappear once every single person stops talking about him? Why should I even bother figuring out alternative sources, what difference does it make in the real world whether I talk about him or about any other anarcho-primitivist?