2 ms·
It's ironic, because Macs somewhat crappily upscale a lot of onscreen content & dont run at native resolution. I hope there's less jank better options but Switc
by rektide 4y ago
It's ironic, because Macs somewhat crappily upscale a lot of onscreen content & dont run at native resolution. I hope there's less jank better options but SwitchX Pro or whatever is what I use to coerce my macbook into running native res. People will drop what they are doing & walk over to me & exclaim: "you can read that?!?!". It's 2880x1800, not even that high density. But it's indeed tiny. I somewhat jokingly answer the trick is to already know whats on the screen.
So yes, more would be nice, in my book, but hardly required, and most of the evidence I see is of people unable to use anything better than 1080p.
Do you have any particular reason to be trashing on the trackpad or is this just more general pissery?
- tehlike 4y agoI have gigabyte aero 4k display. i love the display, i almost hate everything else - the touchpad, the ports, the charger, the wobbliness of the screen hinge. Only bought it for display and it don't regret it.
- tehlike 4y agoAs for touchpad, it wasn't a particular piss at this machine but general situation for nonmacs. I am not a Mac fanboy, i love my Linux laptop but nearly everything i tried had some weirdness about them. Some wears off really fast, some are not as responsive (may be a software driver issue, which i have had problems with pop before but not recently). Macs have had consistently performed great.