12 ms·
Unfortunately "1222 pages" is a pretty clumsy measure of data, making this hard to really get a mental handle on. I'd be more interested in a byte or word coun
by burgerbrain 15y ago
Unfortunately "1222 pages" is a pretty clumsy measure of data, making this hard to really get a mental handle on. I'd be more interested in a byte or word count.
- thematt 15y agoExactly. Look at the margins on the pages in that picture...they look like they're about 2 inches.
- kapitalx 15y agoHopefully only the top page was printed out and he didn't actually print all that out.
- artursapek 15y agoThe saddest part is how much easier it would have been to provide a byte count than to print those out and count the reams he went through (if he even did so)
- jcitme 15y agoI think print to pdf is pretty easy... If anything, easier than byte counts, especially after formatting, graphs, and other stuff is factored in...
- burgerbrain 15y ago@jcitme You've been hellbanned for nearly 5 months. Also, I don't see how bytecounts could possibly be harder than anything else. You'd see it before you even managed to get the (probably multiple) files open to print to pdf.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- ticks 15y agoI don't think the amount of data (or pages) is important, although it's attractive as a headline. The important aspect is the apparent indefinite retention of deleted information. I wonder if the data retention is on purpose? And if so, why? Commercial reasons? A requirement from a stakeholder?