4 ms·
> What’s your point? Just as you had a reason for making errors in writing they may have had a reason for engineering OSM the way they did. Our whole subthrea
by joecool1029 4y ago
> What’s your point?
Just as you had a reason for making errors in writing they may have had a reason for engineering OSM the way they did.
Our whole subthread is off-topic for this site, it was a mistake on my part to turn this around on you. Reminder of site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- MichaelZuo 4y agoRight, but I don’t claim that writing on HN is fundamentally hard, or that I went through a great effort to write comments here. And I would expect for someone to call me out on it if I did. Even the most charitable view of the parent comment would indicate that there was an erroneous belief that a perfect, or near perfect, map would only be finitely more difficult, and achievable in finite time. Whereas in reality the difficulty and time required asymptomatically approaches infinity.