> For example, if we refuse to pay for self-driving taxis on moral grounds (the same way we might refuse to eat factory-farmed chickens) society can make these

> For example, if we refuse to pay for self-driving taxis on moral grounds (the same way we might refuse to eat factory-farmed chickens) society can make these immoral businesses unprofitable. I don't think you've explained why they're immoral. Is it because they displace low skill jobs (seems like a core consequence of technology) or because they're less safe than human drivers (likely temporarily so, with a net number of lives saved through continued use and adoption)?