No, not Nazism although there are resemblances to the Nuremberg laws. Apartheid, however, is a reasonable label in that the in-group is creating a (hostile) se

No, not Nazism although there are resemblances to the Nuremberg laws. Apartheid, however, is a reasonable label in that the in-group is creating a (hostile) set of rules that enforces their world view in spite of others. They know it's discriminatory. It's against various UN and country level guarantees of freedom, and the sole justification is "it's supported by the majority". Hell, lynching black folk were "supported by the majority" in the US back then. Might still be, based on where you look. Change-or-leave isn't a terribly even-handed approach when you expect it to NOT be applied to yourself when outside of Quebec. And as others have said and written, if you have to take such aggressive measures to preserve one's culture, it's already dead. Trying to make the internet be something other than English or Mandarin is a fools errand. I would think it's being driven by the boomers who have spent their lives in pursuit of a goal. They'll accept the scorched-earth "victory" independent of the cost, as otherwise their adult lives were mis-spent or wasted. Their counterparts had 'Nam to deal with, or the wars of the 80's and 90's. They could have tried to make the situation positive and played along with the rules of civil society. But they chose not to and Montreal (again) will pay the price. The rest of the province couldn't care less.