4 ms·
Yes, you got it right, the “natch must be claiming to have a special car” is a bad take. It’s more just that it really, really matters time-wise that the car i
by natch 4y ago
Yes, you got it right, the “natch must be claiming to have a special car” is a bad take.
It’s more just that it really, really matters time-wise that the car is not charging up to full on any given stop,
because that means the charging stops are significantly faster.
People who latch on to the idea of judging EVs on their time to get “fully”‘charged are going to get such a distorted idea that they will never believe current EVs could be a good option. But, they would be mistaken.
- vel0city 4y agoYeah, there's a bit of complexity around it and in the market today you could have two cars which both have the same "max range" but have vastly different times to complete a 1,200mi trip depending on a large number of factors. If you had two cars which state 300mi of range, one charged at 50kW and the other at 350kW, the 350kW car would win that marathon by a large margin. There's more to think about with EVs than just range, that's for sure.