6 ms·
I can’t imagine many professionals would wildly appreciate changing their core tool from underneath them, regardless of whether the tool is actually better. If
by jdgoesmarching 4y ago
I can’t imagine many professionals would wildly appreciate changing their core tool from underneath them, regardless of whether the tool is actually better.
If I wanted to stir the pot with a grenade, I’d say it’s like asking Vim users whether they should all move to VS Code.
- rascul 4y agoWell they probably should move to emacs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpdngXQOkBI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpdngXQOkBI
- pkulak 4y ago> I’d say it’s like asking Vim users whether they should all move to VS Code. If Vim was actively contributing to climate change and fouling the air of everyone around me, I'd switch tomorrow. VS Code has Vim bindings, I'm sure. I'll be okay. We're long past the point where everybody keeps being able to do their first favorite thing at all times, _and_ we somehow also solve this huge problem we've gotten ourselves into.
- realreality 4y agoVS Code obviously contributes more to climate change than Vim.
- pixl97 4y agoYet Vim vs Emacs arguments contribute to a lot of hot air... Zingggg
- xigoi 4y agoI'd gladly move to VS Code if it was more efficient than Vim (and not controlled by Micro$oft, but that's irrelevant). However, that's far from being the case.