4 ms·

I wondered why someone would publish such a list, and happily there is a FAQ which answers that. https://sive.rs/bfaq https://sive.rs/bfaq Your comment was al

by ezsmi 4y ago

I wondered why someone would publish such a list, and happily there is a FAQ which answers that. https://sive.rs/bfaq https://sive.rs/bfaq Your comment was also addressed. “Why don’t I see __(some book)___?” I do read fiction, but I don’t take notes on it. For fiction, I prefer audiobook. I also read hundreds of books before 2007, but didn’t start taking notes until I realized I was forgetting what I had read. And ultimately, I only read things that apply to my life or current interests right now. I say no to all requests, and publishers asking me to do reviews.

loloquwowndueo 4y ago
Well “I do read fiction” and “I prefer audiobook” are mutually exclusive. Listening to someone reading a book is not reading a book.
- mattl 4y ago
  Seems a bit like gatekeeping. Some people rely on audiobooks.
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  - coldtea 4y ago
    >Seems a bit like gatekeeping So? This seems like a thought-stopping word: "Oh, gatekeeping! Awful". I'd say we could use some more gatekeeping. >Some people rely on audiobooks Well, if you mean the blind, or even people with no time outside car commuting, etc, well for them it's another matter. I might rely on a walker to go around, but that doesn't mean that it's just an altertive for walking that I prefer, as opposed to a remedy for a health issue.
    - downriver 4y ago
      I think it’s reasonable to distinguish reading a book and listening to a book. I don’t particularly think one is better or worse, but certainly they are objectively different. My sense is that when people talk about gate keeping there’s necessarily an emotional component. In this case I’d guess perhaps there’s a sense that “reading a book” is valuable or prestigious and they don’t want to exclude someone from it. But to me it’s just an observation of how you consumed content, free of emotional charge.
- AlbertCory 4y ago
  I have an audiobook of my book, "Inventing the Future." You can see me and my narrator talking about it at [1]. I auditioned about 25 narrators before picking him. If you have a lot of dialog, like I do, I think a narrator can bring it to life, by inhabiting the characters. If you're reading the book, you might well be imagining the author talking to you, so an audiobook narrator becomes the voice of the author. So no, they're not mutually exclusive. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGchbES0DhU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGchbES0DhU
- Ishmaeli 4y ago
  That's like saying typing a book on a keyboard or dictating a book is not writing a book.
  - helloworld11 4y ago
    Not quite the case. Reading a book requires a focus on word and sentence structure, a level of attention, that listening to an audio recording doesn't really match. At the least reading requires basic literacy. Thus, listening and reading aren't the same. Writing by any means or dictating text on the other hand both make you have to focus on exactly how you say things in the clearest possible way. This makes them much more similar.

by ezsmi 4y ago

loloquwowndueo 4y ago

Well “I do read fiction” and “I prefer audiobook” are mutually exclusive. Listening to someone reading a book is not reading a book.

mattl 4y ago
Seems a bit like gatekeeping. Some people rely on audiobooks.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- coldtea 4y ago
  >Seems a bit like gatekeeping So? This seems like a thought-stopping word: "Oh, gatekeeping! Awful". I'd say we could use some more gatekeeping. >Some people rely on audiobooks Well, if you mean the blind, or even people with no time outside car commuting, etc, well for them it's another matter. I might rely on a walker to go around, but that doesn't mean that it's just an altertive for walking that I prefer, as opposed to a remedy for a health issue.
  - downriver 4y ago
    I think it’s reasonable to distinguish reading a book and listening to a book. I don’t particularly think one is better or worse, but certainly they are objectively different. My sense is that when people talk about gate keeping there’s necessarily an emotional component. In this case I’d guess perhaps there’s a sense that “reading a book” is valuable or prestigious and they don’t want to exclude someone from it. But to me it’s just an observation of how you consumed content, free of emotional charge.
AlbertCory 4y ago
I have an audiobook of my book, "Inventing the Future." You can see me and my narrator talking about it at [1]. I auditioned about 25 narrators before picking him. If you have a lot of dialog, like I do, I think a narrator can bring it to life, by inhabiting the characters. If you're reading the book, you might well be imagining the author talking to you, so an audiobook narrator becomes the voice of the author. So no, they're not mutually exclusive. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGchbES0DhU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGchbES0DhU
Ishmaeli 4y ago
That's like saying typing a book on a keyboard or dictating a book is not writing a book.
- helloworld11 4y ago
  Not quite the case. Reading a book requires a focus on word and sentence structure, a level of attention, that listening to an audio recording doesn't really match. At the least reading requires basic literacy. Thus, listening and reading aren't the same. Writing by any means or dictating text on the other hand both make you have to focus on exactly how you say things in the clearest possible way. This makes them much more similar.