4 ms·

Dude, you are completely missing the point. Real change should be regulatory, to massive corporations that do by far most damage. Blaming average joe is turnin

Dude, you are completely missing the point. Real change should be regulatory, to massive corporations that do by far most damage. Blaming average joe is turning large part of population into fed-up-by-all-this-shit group, I can see it around me quite a bit. Me personally I am still all in, but at this point I am completely fed up with radical and utterly naive folks who blame all general population and push for more restrictions, celebrating straws and ignoring lobbying elephants. Thats not where real solution is. Going your way is a very ineffective solution that will take too long to get into effect (convince population that will make politicians realize this is what gets them elected, and over time regulations come), and the damage needs to be addressed now

wolverine876 4y ago
That's not what the activists are doing at all - especially the idea of ignoring industry (!!) or "blaming" anyone (but the oil industry)! It's the same old tactic used by reactionaries to polarize and disrupt every other discussion - somehow twist the reactionaries into victims, demonize whoever by just lobbing tons of BS at the wall, and turn it into an impossible emotional discussion. End of discussion! I don't care what you think about activists; I think that's an intentional distraction - just like the others that have been used for decades to prevent action on climate change. You are doing a great job of it. You are missing the point, purposely, because now we are talking about your BS (and there is more BS in the comment, but I have better things to do).