4 ms·
Yes, it is often pedantry and not offered in good faith, but in fairness, the legal definition of "monopolization" requires that you either have a monopoly (def
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Yes, it is often pedantry and not offered in good faith, but in fairness, the legal definition of "monopolization" requires that you either have a monopoly (defined, loosely, as a high-enough marketshare), or, if accused of
"attempted monopolization", that you have a dangerous chance of achieving a monopoly. As you note, that requires defining the "relevant market."
- bee_rider 4y agoI guess I just find it annoying that people want to quibble about "relevant markets" and that kind of stuff, when they could clear up the more likely confusion, which is basically just vocabulary, instead.