> I don't think there is any real backing to the idea that low-status people are more likely to succeed. Point. They definitely aren't more likely to succeed.

> I don't think there is any real backing to the idea that low-status people are more likely to succeed. Point. They definitely aren't more likely to succeed. I do contend they are however, afforded a small opportunity to work on their idea in obscurity until it reaches that stage it can gain traction. And in the meantime, position their chess pieces for the inevitable entry of the avaricious, high-status people looking for a kill at the low-status people's expense. That is, low-status can be deployed as camouflage to deflect attention away from the gathering of resources and information to choose the time, place and terms to start the fight for maintaining control over anything that gains traction. I do agree however, this rarely happens.