3 ms·
I hardly see how this is related to zero-knowledge
by m00dy 4y ago
I hardly see how this is related to zero-knowledge
- ghayes 4y agoYeah zero-knowledge is supposed to give you no usable information, but brute-forcing aside, the fact anyone can learn they are not the target is knowledge, right?
- m00dy 4y agoright.
- motohagiography 4y ago> the fact anyone can learn they are not the target is knowledge, right? To a point, however, you've also described a Bloom filter reasonably well. That is it would show whether their hash is not in the set.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- woojoo666 4y agoI believe "zero knowledge" refers to the third party here. That is, you give it A => B, and it tells you if B => A was given previously, without it knowing the actual values of A or B. While you might be able to brute force the system by trying every name you know, the third party can't unless you give the third party a registry of names to try. Related is the humorous paper "Solving the Dating Problem with the SENPAI Protocol" [1], though the solution in that paper does not rely on a third party. [1]: http://sigtbd.csail.mit.edu/pubs/2016/paper10.pdf http://sigtbd.csail.mit.edu/pubs/2016/paper10.pdf