4 ms·

B. And then get in trouble (or sued) for diffamation once we discover that the domain was initially registered by you. EDIT: Being downvoted because I'm agains

by linkdd 4y ago

B. And then get in trouble (or sued) for diffamation once we discover that the domain was initially registered by you. EDIT: Being downvoted because I'm against public shaming, way to go HN! Go on, downvote me.

loceng 4y ago
If there isn't 1) intent for defamation, and 2) identifiable damages (monetary) then there's no viable lawsuit; and arguably any reputation "damage" is deserved if the organization they're in charge of allowed this to happen so easily.
- roflyear 4y ago
  There doesn't have to be those things to make your life hell, at least not in the US. There just has to be enough of an argument where a judge will be OK with bringing it to court - and even if he isn't OK with it, you'll still have tons of lawyer fees to deal with.
- linkdd 4y ago
  Either way, I think it's irresponsible to target a random employee and throw journalists at him. No, nobody deserves "reputation damage" for the misbehavior of their company (and here, the one at fault is another company).
  - loceng 4y ago
    I mean, what kind of domain name are you imagining is being registered and transferred to them? I'm imagining something relatively mundane but funny.
    - linkdd 4y ago
      The domain name must be paid by someone. After the transfer, if the employee is not up to date with their inbox, they may end up paying for something they did not consent. Is there really no legal basis to sue someone because of this? Is that clearly not malicious behavior from the one who transferred the domain? The domain could be haha.com it would not matter.
      - loceng 4y ago
        You're responsible for checking your credit card for fraudulent charges, too.
        linkdd 4y ago
        And if you're responsible for fraudulent charges on someone else's credit card, you can get into a lot of troubles.
alexeldeib 4y ago
There are technical ways to avoid that, I suspect. Paying Njalla with monero comes to mind.
- ev1 4y ago
  The point of it is same-registrar push not requiring a confirmation: you can't do this with Njalla bc they probably don't use Njalla.
samatman 4y ago
When I saw "funny yet embarrassing" I pictured something like rewrite-the-internet-in-Qbasic.com, creating grounds for a lawsuit is completely optional.

by linkdd 4y ago

loceng 4y ago

If there isn't 1) intent for defamation, and 2) identifiable damages (monetary) then there's no viable lawsuit; and arguably any reputation "damage" is deserved if the organization they're in charge of allowed this to happen so easily.

roflyear 4y ago
There doesn't have to be those things to make your life hell, at least not in the US. There just has to be enough of an argument where a judge will be OK with bringing it to court - and even if he isn't OK with it, you'll still have tons of lawyer fees to deal with.
linkdd 4y ago
Either way, I think it's irresponsible to target a random employee and throw journalists at him. No, nobody deserves "reputation damage" for the misbehavior of their company (and here, the one at fault is another company).
- loceng 4y ago
  I mean, what kind of domain name are you imagining is being registered and transferred to them? I'm imagining something relatively mundane but funny.
  - linkdd 4y ago
    The domain name must be paid by someone. After the transfer, if the employee is not up to date with their inbox, they may end up paying for something they did not consent. Is there really no legal basis to sue someone because of this? Is that clearly not malicious behavior from the one who transferred the domain? The domain could be haha.com it would not matter.
    - loceng 4y ago
      You're responsible for checking your credit card for fraudulent charges, too.
      - linkdd 4y ago
        And if you're responsible for fraudulent charges on someone else's credit card, you can get into a lot of troubles.

alexeldeib 4y ago

There are technical ways to avoid that, I suspect. Paying Njalla with monero comes to mind.

ev1 4y ago
The point of it is same-registrar push not requiring a confirmation: you can't do this with Njalla bc they probably don't use Njalla.

samatman 4y ago

When I saw "funny yet embarrassing" I pictured something like rewrite-the-internet-in-Qbasic.com, creating grounds for a lawsuit is completely optional.