Quoting one publication about MISRA [1]: "From the data obtained, we can make the following key observations. First, there are 9 out of 72 rules for which viol

Quoting one publication about MISRA [1]: "From the data obtained, we can make the following key observations. First, there are 9 out of 72 rules for which violations were observed that perform significantly better (α = 0.05) than a random predictor at locating fault-related lines. The true positive rates for these rules range from 24-100%. Second, we observed a negative correlation between MISRA rule violations and observed faults. In addition, 29 out of 72 rules had a zero true positive rate. Taken together with Adams' observation that all modifications have a non-zero probability of introducing a fault, this makes it possible that adherence to the MISRA standard as a whole would have made the software less reliable." [1] https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:646de5ba-eee8-4ec8-8bbc-2c188e1847ea?collection=research https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:646de5ba...