4 ms·
> Certainly any language that differentiates between async code and non-async code has the async code be a pain. Function colouring is not the only problem wit
by hirrolot 4y ago
> Certainly any language that differentiates between async code and non-async code has the async code be a pain.
Function colouring is not the only problem with async code. The difference is that concurrency in other high-level languages usually don't break down polymorphism and other language features. Also, they don't push you to deal with lifetimes, which is a serious issue in Rusty async.
Writing async code in C# is a lot easier to me than in Rust. Unfortunately, I didn't have a chance to write async in functional languages, such as Haskell or F#, because they are well-known for elegant concurrency.
- int_19h 4y agoI'm not sure if C# async was derived from F#, but it definitely looks very similar. The main difference is that in F# async is vastly more customizable (but also slower, because the compiler can't make certain assumptions due to said customizability. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-reference/computation-expressions https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-refe...