3 ms·
My org is heavily invested in Ember and it sucks. We're into it for purely historical purposes. It was chosen by devs 2 generations past. It's not a terrible fr
by tootie 4y ago
My org is heavily invested in Ember and it sucks. We're into it for purely historical purposes. It was chosen by devs 2 generations past. It's not a terrible framework conceptually, but being invested in anything niche or out of fashion is such a burden. No one knows how it works, can't hire for it, updates are rare, hard to find integrations. I would not venture outside the mainstream if you can't afford to take big risks.
- endisneigh 4y agoWhat version of ember? Modern octane is pretty similar to vue and react. Honestly all of the frameworks are very similar now.
- dbbk 4y agoI was very keen on Ember for a long time, loved the batteries-included nature, generators etc. The closest thing React had was Next.js, and it was (still is) heavily restricted by its router. Although this is now changing. Ember really lost momentum though. There were a bunch of releases that literally had "no changes". I think its time has just passed, sadly.
- tootie 4y agoI mean I was a big fan of Mercurial and think it is categorically superior to git in every way but I haven't bothered recommending it in years because it's just not practical.