3 ms·
I mean if it works, but it's also the ugliest thing I've seen. It's up there with those plastic covers for furniture. A standalone air purifier in the corner wo
by post_break 4y ago
I mean if it works, but it's also the ugliest thing I've seen. It's up there with those plastic covers for furniture. A standalone air purifier in the corner would be less noticeable and ikea even makes a table with a hidden one: https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/starkvind-table-with-air-purifier-stained-oak-veneer-white-80461974/ https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/starkvind-table-with-air-purifi...
Aesthetics matter. Now if you could somehow make the blades the filters, that would be badass.
- flybrand 4y agoI agree - I love the enthusiasm for IAQ, the data is fantastic - but find a conventional white good stand alone room air purifier “RAP” and it will be as effective, better designed, and likely in the same cost range once changeouts are considered.
- s5300 4y agoAesthetics only matter for the extremely insecure. I for one would happily proclaim “my shitty looking box fan contraption that costs $100 outperforms your $700 dyson by a decent margin” Why lick the boots of brand centric corporations. Maybe you’re one of those “lifestyle brand” people… I think that’s code for no originality or personality.
- post_break 4y agoA box fan with a filter looks infinitely better than filters taped to the ceiling... I have a dyson air purifier because the sound profile is different and doesn't keep me up while I sleep. In the room with my 3d printer I have the jankiest air purifier I could find. If you're ok with this contraption taped to your ceiling, while having guests over, more power to you. This of course would be totally fine if you lived in a state dealing with wild fire smoke I will say.