I wonder if Shimano really cancelled of if there was some clause in the original agreement for preventing automatic handover in case of an acquisition that was

I wonder if Shimano really cancelled of if there was some clause in the original agreement for preventing automatic handover in case of an acquisition that was invoked by some legal division at Shimano that simply doesn't have strategic decisions or customer happiness anywhere close of their job descriptions. Are they really actively trying to hurt a competitor or is it just some organizational automatism with nobody sufficiently in charge top correct course? I'm not exactly prone to defend Shimano (jumping through hoops to run Campagnolo), but I wouldn't be surprised if it all ended up with a big, genuine "sorry, we don't quite understand why exactly it happened"